Nepal

Tags:

Develop 1 SO; 3 IRs with one indicator for each and 3 sub IRs without indicators.

Goal: Reintegration of FCS's into society

Indicator: % of FCS's that complete a set of defined major life milestones on a timely basis (e.g., marriage; employment; child-rearing; civil society engagement)

Source: Survey of FCSs

Assumption: Peace is maintained

Purpose: To increase school completion in the FCS population in Kathmandu Valley

Indicator: 70% of FCSs pass SLC exam

Source: Ministry of Education Report

Assumption: Public policy continues to support reconciliation

Outputs: New school facilities; adapted school curriculum to meet special FCS needs; teacher training system

Indicator: % of communities with FCSs that have adopted and are properly using new curriculum; % of FCSs who are enrolled in school where new curriculum is offered

Source: School Survey

Assumption: Population growth does not place unforeseen pressure on schools

Activities: teacher trauma sensitivity training; teacher life skills training; building new school structures; community awareness programs (to sensitize local leaders to needs of FCSs); provide allowances (free school lunch and take-home rations); clothing bank; academic tutoring

Budget: teacher trauma sensitivity training, $20,000; teacher life skills training, $20,000; building new school structures, $20,000; community awareness programs (to sensitize local leaders to needs of FCSs), $10,000; provide allowances (free school lunch and take-home rations), $75,000; clothing bank, $5,000; academic tutoring, $50,000

Receipts: Invoices

Assumptions: Local currency does not change (Economy stays stable)

Worksheet 4: Results Framework Assessment

Sector: Nepal

Name of Strategic Objective:

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE RESULTS FRAMEWORK

CAUSAL LINKAGE: At each level of the results framework, does achievement of one result cause the achievement of the other? Is the linkage direct?

Yes, but need to address issues of transportation.

CONTRIBUTIONS OF USAID

PARTNERS: At each level of the results framework, have activities been identified (regardless of whether they will be conducted by USAID or its partners) to cause the result at the next level? [Note: not all results from USAID partners need to be identified in the framework but there may at least be mention of them in the narrative that accompanies the framework.]

Yes

MANAGEABLE INTEREST (A): Is the SO level result one that the team, working with its partners, can materially affect?

Yes

MANAGEABLE INTEREST (B): Is the team willing to be held accountable for all results within the results framework, including the SO level result?

Yes

CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS: Have all the critical assumptions been identified at

each level of the results framework?

Whether or not the children are interested in receiving the services provided.